PB'10 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN/wcsp/spot5/
normalized-spot5-29_wcsp.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN/wcsp/spot5/
normalized-spot5-29_wcsp.wbo
MD5SUM429cc4a9012eaf2031e2cb9a0fbbc756
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, big integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark8059
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark70.19
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables202
Total number of constraints774
Number of soft constraints692
Number of constraints which are clauses692
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)82
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints0
Minimum length of a constraint1
Maximum length of a constraint4
Top cost 20092
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 20092
Sum of constraints costs 12276211
Biggest number in a constraint 1
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 1
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 5
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers3
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PB/CT 0.1 fixed (complete)2701593OPTIMUM 70.19 70.3019
SAT4J PB Resolution 2.2.1 (complete)2701592OPTIMUM 379.192 376.93
PB/CT 0.1 (complete)2701591Wrong UNSAT 0.026995 0.0271139
SAT4J PB Resolution 2.2.0 2010-05-26 (complete)2701588Wrong UNSAT 0.289954 0.258284
SAT4J PB CuttingPlanes 2.2.0 2010-05-26 (complete)2701589Wrong UNSAT 0.292955 0.253396
SAT4J PB RES // CP 2.2.0 2010-05-31 (complete)2701590Wrong UNSAT 0.398938 1.24329

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 8059
Solution found:
x1 -x2 -x3 x4 -x5 x6 -x7 x8 x9 -x10 -x11 x12 -x13 x14 -x15 x16 -x17 x18 x19 -x20 -x21 x22 -x23 x24 -x25 x26 -x27 x28 x29 -x30 -x31 x32 -x33
x34 -x35 x36 -x37 x38 x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 x47 -x48 x49 -x50 x51 -x52 -x53 x54 -x55 x56 -x57 x58 x59 -x60 -x61 x62 x63 -x64
-x65 x66 -x67 x68 x69 -x70 -x71 x72 -x73 x74 x75 -x76 x77 -x78 x79 -x80 x81 -x82 x83 -x84 x85 -x86 x87 -x88 x89 -x90 x91 -x92 -x93 x94 x95
-x96 -x97 x98 x99 -x100 -x101 x102 x103 -x104 x105 -x106 -x107 x108 -x109 x110 x111 -x112 -x113 -x114 -x115 x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 x120
-x121 -x122 -x123 x124 -x125 x126 x127 -x128 -x129 x130 -x131 x132 x133 -x134 -x135 -x136 -x137 x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 x142 -x143 -x144
-x145 x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 x154 -x155 x156 x157 -x158 -x159 x160 -x161 x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 x166 -x167 -x168
-x169 x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 x174 x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 x180 -x181 -x182 x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 x188 x189 -x190 -x191 -x192
x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 x198 -x199 -x200 x201 -x202