PB'06 evaluation: results by benchmark

Results by benchmark for category optimisation, small integers (OPT-SMALLINT), subcategory Handmade, subsubcategory Travelling Tournament Problem

This page displays the results of the different solvers for each benchmark for category optimisation, small integers (OPT-SMALLINT), subcategory Handmade, subsubcategory Travelling Tournament Problem

REMINDER

Keep in mind that the 'Best result' columns only provide the best result given by one of the solvers. This 'Best result' may be wrong in case of an UNSATISFIABLE or OPTIMUM FOUND answer (because there's no efficient way to check these answers).

Description of a cell contents:

Cell exampleMeaning
AnswerSolver result
f=...value of the objective function for the model reported by the solver
TT=...Total Time (TT): this is the CPU time (in seconds) used by the solver until termination. This time is only meaningful for complete solvers because incomplete solvers will always run until they time out
T1=...Time to get the best model (T1): this is the wall clock time (in seconds) ellapsed when the solver found its best model. This time is obtained from the 'o lines'. It is useful to compare both complete and incomplete solvers. It doesn't take into account the time to prove optimality of the solution.
Remember that CPU time and wall clock time are two very different notions. The CPU time represents the time during which the instructions of the solver were executed by the processor. The wall clock time represents how much time ellapsed on the clock. For a same event, the CPU time may be either smaller or greater than the wall clock time depending on the number of threads of execution and the number of processors.

Meaning of some abbreviations:

AbbreviationMeaning
f=...Value of the objective function
TOTime Out
MOMem. Out (out of memory)

Meaning of the different colors:

ColorMeaning
textthe solver cannot handle this instance
textthe solver gave no answer
textthe solver could give an answer (SAT)
textthe solver gave a definitive answer (OPTIMUM FOUND or UNSAT)
textthe solver performed better than the other ones on that instance (complete solvers point of view)
textthe solver performed better than the other ones on that instance (incomplete solvers point of view)
textthe solver was ended by a signal or other problem
textthe solver gave an incomplete answer
textthe solver gave a wrong answer

For better readability, you may choose to hide some solvers:
absconPseudo 1
bsolo 2006/05
glpPB 0.2
minisat+ 1.14
PBS 4.1L
PB-smodels 1.28
PB-smodels 1.31
Pueblo 1.3
Pueblo 1.4
SAT4JPSEUDO 2006.2
SAT4JPSEUDO 2006.2 Heuristics
wildcat-rnp 0.8.0
wildcat-skc 0.8.0

Bench nameBest results
on this
instance
absconPseudo
1
bsolo
2006/05
glpPB
0.2
minisat+
1.14
PBS
4.1L
PB-smodels
1.28
PB-smodels
1.31
Pueblo
1.3
Pueblo
1.4
SAT4JPSEUDO
2006.2
SAT4JPSEUDO
2006.2 Heuristics
wildcat-rnp
0.8.0
wildcat-skc
0.8.0
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB05/manquinho/ttp/
normalized-circ10_3.opb
SAT
f=340
TT=1782.81
T1=99.37
? (TO)

TT=1800.64

SAT
f=356
TT=1800.06
T1=48.58
? (TO)

TT=1800.59

SAT (TO)
f=348
TT=1800.75
T1=1262.3
? (TO)

TT=1800.58

? (TO)

TT=1800.72

? (TO)

TT=1800.5

SAT
f=340
TT=1782.81
T1=99.37
SAT
f=346
TT=1782.79
T1=617.04
SAT (TO)
f=368
TT=1800.39
T1=264.61
SAT (TO)
f=378
TT=1801.01
T1=376.87
? (TO)

TT=1800.59

SAT (TO)
f=372
TT=1800.61
T1=1546.97
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB05/manquinho/
ttp/normalized-circ4_3.opb
OPT
f=20
TT=0.166
T1=0.01
OPT
f=20
TT=14.914
T1=5.68
OPT
f=20
TT=23.116
T1=0.16
OPT
f=20
TT=76.043
T1=76.06
OPT
f=20
TT=0.302
T1=0.07
OPT
f=20
TT=0.271
T1=0.01
OPT
f=20
TT=1.205
T1=0.3
OPT
f=20
TT=1.261
T1=0.17
OPT
f=20
TT=0.207
T1=0.01
OPT
f=20
TT=0.166
T1=0.01
OPT
f=20
TT=2.53
T1=0.99
OPT
f=20
TT=2.451
T1=0.78
SAT (TO)
f=20
TT=1800.41
T1=12.35
SAT (TO)
f=20
TT=1800.56
T1=10.67
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB05/manquinho/
ttp/normalized-circ6_3.opb
SAT
f=64
TT=1782.73
T1=157.72
? (TO)

TT=1800.81

SAT
f=66
TT=1800.22
T1=794.99
? (TO)

TT=1800.57

SAT (TO)
f=68
TT=1800.65
T1=55.65
? (TO)

TT=1800.67

SAT (TO)
f=74
TT=1800.88
T1=38.21
SAT (TO)
f=74
TT=1800.85
T1=160.24
SAT
f=64
TT=1782.73
T1=157.72
SAT
f=66
TT=1782.74
T1=1468.86
SAT (TO)
f=70
TT=1800.95
T1=363.43
SAT (TO)
f=72
TT=1800.63
T1=1432.78
? (TO)

TT=1800.69

SAT (TO)
f=64
TT=1800.49
T1=1275.15
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB05/manquinho/
ttp/normalized-circ8_3.opb
SAT
f=162
TT=1800.43
T1=1576.36
? (TO)

TT=1800.91

SAT
f=170
TT=1800.06
T1=770.35
? (TO)

TT=1800.73

SAT (TO)
f=172
TT=1800.71
T1=1036.34
? (TO)

TT=1800.63

? (TO)

TT=1800.6

? (TO)

TT=1800.7

SAT
f=168
TT=1782.75
T1=6.73
SAT
f=168
TT=1782.76
T1=117.05
SAT (TO)
f=180
TT=1800.53
T1=348.1
SAT (TO)
f=184
TT=1800.93
T1=256.84
? (TO)

TT=1800.65

SAT (TO)
f=162
TT=1800.43
T1=1576.36
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB05/manquinho/ttp/
normalized-data10_3.opb
SAT
f=79290
TT=1800.06
T1=391.43
? (TO)

TT=1800.52

SAT
f=79290
TT=1800.06
T1=391.43
? (TO)

TT=1800.69

SAT (TO)
f=81481
TT=1800.51
T1=1562.38
? (TO)

TT=1800.6

? (TO)

TT=1800.56

? (TO)

TT=1800.37

SAT
f=79426
TT=1782.77
T1=681.5
SAT
f=80503
TT=1782.77
T1=1204.28
SAT (TO)
f=85398
TT=1800.43
T1=451.76
SAT (TO)
f=85746
TT=1800.91
T1=800.4
? (TO)

TT=1800.63

? (TO)

TT=1800.64

normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB05/manquinho/
ttp/normalized-data4_3.opb
OPT
f=8276
TT=0.179
T1=0.02
OPT
f=8276
TT=22.677
T1=11.44
OPT
f=8276
TT=27.683
T1=2.58
OPT
f=8276
TT=4.43
T1=4.43
OPT
f=8276
TT=2.265
T1=1.2
OPT
f=8276
TT=0.292
T1=0.03
OPT
f=8276
TT=1.386
T1=0.49
OPT
f=8276
TT=1.268
T1=0.33
OPT
f=8276
TT=0.179
T1=0.02
OPT
f=8276
TT=0.286
T1=0.02
OPT
f=8276
TT=5.663
T1=1.18
OPT
f=8276
TT=8.01
T1=1.78
SAT (TO)
f=8276
TT=1800.68
T1=17.69
SAT (TO)
f=8276
TT=1800.49
T1=13.25
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB05/manquinho/
ttp/normalized-data6_3.opb
SAT
f=24674
TT=1782.74
T1=652.58
? (TO)

TT=1800.71

SAT
f=26996
TT=1800.11
T1=1399.83
? (TO)

TT=1800.52

SAT (TO)
f=26293
TT=1800.66
T1=606.44
? (TO)

TT=1800.6

SAT (TO)
f=26164
TT=1800.9
T1=1033.3
SAT (TO)
f=25843
TT=1800.95
T1=1591.08
SAT
f=25008
TT=1782.73
T1=1729
SAT
f=24674
TT=1782.74
T1=652.58
SAT (TO)
f=27494
TT=1801.02
T1=617.68
SAT (TO)
f=26983
TT=1801.06
T1=51.85
? (TO)

TT=1800.66

SAT (TO)
f=24872
TT=1800.68
T1=635.46
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB05/manquinho/
ttp/normalized-data8_3.opb
SAT
f=46478
TT=1800.44
T1=1410.82
? (TO)

TT=1800.29

SAT
f=47885
TT=1800.07
T1=1413.16
? (TO)

TT=1800.67

SAT (TO)
f=48556
TT=1800.52
T1=1412.9
? (TO)

TT=1800.56

? (TO)

TT=1800.79

? (TO)

TT=1800.7

SAT
f=48358
TT=1782.75
T1=1616.45
SAT
f=47977
TT=1782.76
T1=82.58
SAT (TO)
f=51781
TT=1801.02
T1=1164.08
SAT (TO)
f=51137
TT=1801.1
T1=938.9
? (TO)

TT=1800.48

SAT (TO)
f=46478
TT=1800.44
T1=1410.82

Some statistics...

absconPseudo
1
bsolo
2006/05
glpPB
0.2
minisat+
1.14
PBS
4.1L
PB-smodels
1.28
PB-smodels
1.31
Pueblo
1.3
Pueblo
1.4
SAT4JPSEUDO
2006.2
SAT4JPSEUDO
2006.2 Heuristics
wildcat-rnp
0.8.0
wildcat-skc
0.8.0
Number of times the solver is able to give the best known answer2322222432203
Number of times the solver is able to give the best known answer from an incomplete solver point of view (i.e. without considering optimality proof)2322222432225
Number of times the solver is the best solver from a complete solver point of view (i.e. best known answer and best TT time)0100000320002
Number of times the solver is the best solver from an incomplete solver point of view (i.e. best known answer and best T1 time)0100100430002