MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
maxcsp/planning/
normalized-zenotravel02bc_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namemaxcsp/planning/
normalized-zenotravel02bc_ext.xml
MD5SUM4940ef38e4899bcdaa4c87f10be98545
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints3
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.169973
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables117
Number of constraints5362
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size19
Number of constraints which are defined in extension5362
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271125446OPTIMUM3 0.169973 0.176237
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271125445OPTIMUM3 0.560914 0.571893
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1125442OPTIMUM3 64.4062 111.064
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1125441OPTIMUM3 795.231 1915.8
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301125439MSAT (TO)3 3600.07 3602.92
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301125440MSAT (TO)3 3600.1 3604.92
Sugar v1.13+minisat1125444? (MO) 80.1394 85.7434
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1125443? (MO) 81.4156 83.9735

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 3
Solution found:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1