MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-3_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-3_ext.xml
MD5SUM3b0f4f3d9fb4873abcdbd753efb5e9cf
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1184.98
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints103
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size80
Number of constraints which are defined in extension103
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1115188OPTIMUM2 1184.98 1198.04
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271115189OPTIMUM2 2539.53 2562.31
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1115187OPTIMUM2 2809.4 2831.05
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301115183MSAT (TO)2 3600.05 3645.32
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301115184MSAT (TO)2 3600.1 3609.42
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1115185MSAT (TO)5 2204.21 4000.04
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1115186MSAT (TO)5 3600.16 3666.61
toulbar2 2008-06-271115190? (TO) 3600.03 3633.61

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
44 29 79 57 33 78 2 45 22 68 8 4 79 37 60 43 41 71 40 68 43 69 76 79 66 6 66 41 54 67 64 67 56 64 26 2 62 64 75 58