MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/composed-75-1-80/
normalized-composed-75-1-80-8_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/composed-75-1-80/
normalized-composed-75-1-80-8_ext.xml
MD5SUMc948ce3ae2ec01bb0392253eb0ab6bfe
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.114982
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables83
Number of constraints702
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension702
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271115142OPTIMUM2 0.114982 0.121055
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271115141OPTIMUM2 0.775881 0.789524
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1115139OPTIMUM2 5.70513 6.12855
Sugar v1.13+minisat1115140OPTIMUM2 11.6152 12.1849
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1115137OPTIMUM2 153.634 339.051
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1115138MSAT (TO)2 1597.23 4000.05
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301115135MSAT (TO)2 3600.02 3643.52
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301115136MSAT (TO)2 3600.03 3654.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
0 0 3 5 8 3 0 0 0 2 0 6 4 4 4 3 3 0 4 1 4 0 5 0 3 1 2 1 0 0 5 5 9 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 2 4 1 9 5 5 0 9 2 4 8 6 0 1 1 6 0 1 0 0 3 9 1 0 2 6 2 2 4
0 5 3 1 5 3 2 7 6 6 8 4 0