MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-94_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-94_ext.xml
MD5SUMdf20c7367ecd48e6e4a3b5fcb67ad1ec
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark585.395
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints753
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension753
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1115084OPTIMUM1 585.395 591.708
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1115083OPTIMUM1 1906.22 1971.85
toulbar2 2008-06-271115086OPTIMUM1 2246.48 2329.44
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271115085OPTIMUM1 2462.86 2503.28
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1115081MSAT (TO)1 1595.62 4000.07
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1115082MSAT (TO)1 1598.01 4000.04
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301115080MSAT (TO)1 3600.01 3690.82
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301115079MSAT (TO)1 3600.07 3683.93

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
6 5 7 1 4 2 7 2 6 7 7 1 2 6 6 7 7 3 0 6 1 5 3 5 3 5 1 5 3 3 5 3 6 4 2 6 6 6 3 7