MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-78_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-78_ext.xml
MD5SUM8c1f6ccac803ecd715fe8379bb39abf1
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMSAT TO
Best Number of falsified constraints2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1592.6
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints752
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension752
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1115050MSAT (TO)2 1592.6 4000.08
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1115049MSAT (TO)2 1721.52 4000.09
Sugar v1.13+minisat1115052MSAT (TO)2 3600.04 3651.82
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301115048MSAT (TO)2 3600.04 3648.83
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301115047MSAT (TO)2 3600.09 3659.82
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1115051MSAT (TO)5 3600.11 3700.13
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271115053? (TO)4 3600.11 3656.91
toulbar2 2008-06-271115054? (TO) 3600.03 3649.41

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
7 3 7 2 7 3 4 6 1 4 2 5 5 7 5 0 1 7 2 3 7 5 2 1 0 3 7 1 6 1 2 0 5 1 2 2 4 7 4 3