MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-45_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-45_ext.xml
MD5SUMbf2b5d2944d64cfbe674b71a5942c68c
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark131.423
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints84
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size180
Number of constraints which are defined in extension84
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1115004OPTIMUM1 131.423 132.625
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1115003OPTIMUM1 148.183 149.069
toulbar2 2008-06-271115006OPTIMUM1 893.364 897.14
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114999MSAT (TO)1 3600.07 3649.52
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301115000MSAT (TO)2 3600.1 3655.23
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1115001MSAT (TO)3 1571.83 4000.08
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1115002MSAT (TO)3 1574.76 4000.06
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271115005? (exit code) 17.3604 17.3888

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
107 9 72 17 66 179 72 132 31 169 10 175 178 105 155 23 150 71 2 109 177 119 166 27 135 58 111 26 140 99 29 89 96 173 153 168 175 175 128 2