MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-40_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-40_ext.xml
MD5SUMa91b122166d09430f4c9a44f5a97b7f6
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMSAT TO
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark3600.06
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints84
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size180
Number of constraints which are defined in extension84
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114915MSAT (TO)1 3600.06 3605.13
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114911MSAT (TO)2 3600.07 3622.02
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114912MSAT (TO)4 3600.09 3601.43
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114913MSAT (TO)5 1573.8 4000.03
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114914MSAT (TO)5 1587.28 4000.05
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114916MSAT (TO)5 3600.02 3614.73
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114917? (exit code) 16.9804 17.135
toulbar2 2008-06-271114918? (TO) 3600.05 3602.31

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
147 163 78 29 168 145 122 115 90 155 128 132 8 82 130 90 88 175 3 147 79 173 97 175 104 62 157 177 179 115 179 23 91 157 92 166 118 172 162
95