MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.65/
normalized-rand-2-40-40-135-650-66_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.65/
normalized-rand-2-40-40-135-650-66_ext.xml
MD5SUM1fa392c0e1d3c46429e536f63ebe8661
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1232.73
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints135
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size40
Number of constraints which are defined in extension135
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271114886OPTIMUM1 1232.73 1237.7
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114885OPTIMUM1 1956.14 1969.3
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114880MSAT (TO)1 3600.03 3614.02
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114879MSAT (TO)1 3600.03 3601.52
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114883MSAT (TO)1 3600.13 3629.32
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114882MSAT (TO)2 1564.38 4000.04
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114884MSAT (TO)2 3600.07 3601.72
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114881MSAT (TO)2 3600.2 3662.93

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
22 5 20 19 28 26 10 10 5 12 8 13 0 28 4 4 8 11 24 8 3 11 6 18 1 27 9 29 17 29 14 28 39 22 38 16 28 22 24 35