MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-10_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-10_ext.xml
MD5SUM1ac6bf6bb51b42f0085f325a1bbfbd20
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark186.861
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114460OPTIMUM1 186.861 188.895
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114459OPTIMUM1 207.814 210.083
toulbar2 2008-06-271114462OPTIMUM1 364.587 367.748
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114461OPTIMUM1 716.132 722.303
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114455MSAT (TO)1 3600.04 3625.42
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114456MSAT (TO)1 3600.05 3628.42
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114458MSAT (TO)2 1584.07 4000.06
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114457MSAT (TO)2 1587.59 4000.04

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
6 14 4 1 13 4 7 4 4 2 10 2 15 11 11 7 4 6 5 6 6 8 12 7 7 11 15 11 9 7 12 10 7 15 10 8 5 5 14 15