MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-90_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-90_ext.xml
MD5SUMc866bb6a5cbfacfad286a14d732ce0db
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark260.461
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271114422OPTIMUM1 260.461 261.557
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114421OPTIMUM1 324.069 328.026
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114420OPTIMUM1 714.398 719.091
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114419OPTIMUM1 1141.81 1155.31
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114417MSAT (TO)1 1584.73 4000.11
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114418MSAT (TO)1 1605.39 4000.05
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114416MSAT (TO)1 3600.02 3625.72
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114415MSAT (TO)1 3600.08 3634.52

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
5 7 0 7 8 11 4 14 10 8 4 15 0 3 1 13 3 15 10 0 3 12 14 0 0 5 1 13 13 12 2 9 6 1 12 3 7 5 5 14