MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-11_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-11_ext.xml
MD5SUM2fd52ee687e51ab55cbb8c526b5e7d1f
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark285.515
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints180
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size25
Number of constraints which are defined in extension180
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114372OPTIMUM1 285.515 287.59
toulbar2 2008-06-271114374OPTIMUM1 330.969 333.948
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114371OPTIMUM1 890.263 894.446
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114373OPTIMUM1 1025.51 1029.54
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114370MSAT (TO)1 1582.15 4000.06
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114369MSAT (TO)1 1587.12 4000.07
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114367MSAT (TO)1 3600.02 3625.92
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114368MSAT (TO)1 3600.04 3622.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
15 3 3 7 12 0 2 1 22 10 6 13 7 19 22 21 18 16 20 4 24 11 7 10 4 16 9 22 24 14 3 5 16 5 20 19 20 9 7 5