MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/composed-75-1-2/
normalized-composed-75-1-2-7_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/composed-75-1-2/
normalized-composed-75-1-2-7_ext.xml
MD5SUM14dbb1425b91bb16d7c05f2df977a132
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.329948
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables83
Number of constraints624
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension624
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271114302OPTIMUM1 0.329948 0.336751
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114301OPTIMUM1 0.559914 0.596868
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114299OPTIMUM1 4.72728 8.64748
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114300OPTIMUM1 9.61754 10.5195
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114298OPTIMUM1 31.1943 31.8277
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114297OPTIMUM1 32.886 36.3367
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114296MSAT (TO)1 3600.07 3634.12
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114295MSAT (TO)1 3600.08 3606.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
0 8 0 4 5 1 1 1 4 2 3 0 5 1 1 1 5 8 7 0 0 7 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 7 0 8 7 1 5 6 0 3 0 0 2 3 4 8 0 4 6 1 0 1 4 5 2 1 2 6 2 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 5 8 9 0 0
8 0 5 0 9 2 4 4 4 5 6 7 2