MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-11_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-11_ext.xml
MD5SUM2ea4537f3cfa2316558a875189215d8d
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark6.31404
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints822
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension822
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1108755OPTIMUM2 6.31404 8.28653
Sugar v1.13+minisat1108756OPTIMUM2 16.0306 17.3663
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1108754MSAT (TO)2 1600.29 4000.04
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1108753MSAT (TO)2 1607.22 4000.04
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301108751MSAT (TO)2 3600.04 3620.62
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301108752MSAT (TO)2 3600.08 3618.42
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271108757? (TO) 3600.06 3628.02
toulbar2 2008-06-271108758? (TO) 3600.07 3631.41

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
6 4 9 8 0 5 1 3 2 7 3 7 1 2 6 0 9 4 5 8 2 6 3 4 5 9 7 0 8 1 4 9 0 6 3 7 2 8 1 5 0 2 8 5 7 1 4 9 3 6 5 0 2 3 1 4 8 6 7 9 7 8 5 0 4 2 6 1 9 3
8 1 6 7 9 3 0 2 6 4 1 3 4 9 8 6 5 7 0 2 9 5 7 1 2 8 3 5 4 0