CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-52_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-52_ext.xml
MD5SUM518f122a0f289c859513203eb0c2ab6c
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.907861
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints103
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size80
Number of constraints which are defined in extension103
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
cpHydra k_101103146SAT 0.907861 0.907233
Mistral-prime 1.3131103141SAT 0.960853 0.97281
cpHydra k_401103147SAT 0.967852 0.978473
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271103131SAT 4.37233 4.37372
MDG-probe 2008-06-271103130SAT 5.28419 5.33427
Mistral-option 1.3141103140SAT 6.90295 6.96506
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301103128SAT 18.0133 18.1437
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261103136SAT 21.4787 21.5418
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261103137SAT 21.7647 21.9669
Sugar v1.13+picosat1103133SAT 31.7232 32.1594
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107236SAT 32.2071 32.3902
spider 2008-06-141103129SAT 82.9704 83.771
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131103132SAT 101.803 102.761
bpsolver 2008-06-271103135SAT 221.402 226.191
Abscon 112v4 AC1103144SAT 288.358 289.758
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1103145SAT 292.547 293.624
casper zito1103143SAT 366.001 373.229
casper zao1103142SAT 555.245 558.08
galac M1103138SAT 880.097 884.462
Sugar v1.13+minisat1103134SAT 909.583 911.823
galac E1103139SAT 1079.45 1084.45
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301103127? (TO) 1800.01 1801.32
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301103126? (TO) 1800.02 1800.73

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
16 65 3 20 11 61 21 46 27 1 54 61 22 61 7 11 26 68 60 69 9 2 39 48 20 8 9 12 25 2 11 20 27 0 31 3 26 18 25 0