CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-83_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-83_ext.xml
MD5SUM76f8d78401c9e50636602605612f7816
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2.00469
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints103
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size80
Number of constraints which are defined in extension103
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131103097UNSAT 2.00469 2.02572
MDG-probe 2008-06-271103086UNSAT 2.01969 2.04001
Mistral-option 1.3141103096UNSAT 2.12968 2.15173
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271103087UNSAT 2.39764 2.41494
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301103084UNSAT 5.71613 5.81899
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261103092UNSAT 14.7318 14.9043
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261103093UNSAT 14.9057 15.0662
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131103088UNSAT 38.1512 38.5389
galac E1103095UNSAT 41.5187 41.9821
spider 2008-06-141103085UNSAT 44.2783 44.7417
cpHydra k_401103103UNSAT 96.8573 97.1628
cpHydra k_101103102UNSAT 97.3122 97.5233
Abscon 112v4 AC1103100UNSAT 98.0351 98.9251
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1103101UNSAT 98.474 99.3559
Sugar v1.13+picosat1103089UNSAT 103.519 104.56
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107246UNSAT 107.039 108.12
galac M1103094UNSAT 125.422 126.696
Sugar v1.13+minisat1103090UNSAT 137.177 137.851
bpsolver 2008-06-271103091UNSAT 173.602 175.106
casper zito1103099UNSAT 390.665 394.366
casper zao1103098UNSAT 412.799 414.712
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301103083? (TO) 1800.05 1804.22
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301103082? (TO) 1800.09 1807.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: