CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-29_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-29_ext.xml
MD5SUM8823420e0241e370f98d21e03c99933a
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark3.49147
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints103
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size80
Number of constraints which are defined in extension103
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131103075UNSAT 3.49147 3.51572
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271103065UNSAT 3.56546 3.60016
MDG-probe 2008-06-271103064UNSAT 3.60745 3.64359
Mistral-option 1.3141103074UNSAT 3.63045 3.66415
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301103062UNSAT 7.57885 7.66642
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261103071UNSAT 21.1988 21.2402
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1103079UNSAT 22.6226 22.8587
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261103070UNSAT 22.9985 23.2332
Abscon 112v4 AC1103078UNSAT 24.4633 24.7378
cpHydra k_401103081UNSAT 30.2184 30.4544
cpHydra k_101103080UNSAT 32.3301 32.9783
spider 2008-06-141103063UNSAT 54.7177 55.2183
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107233UNSAT 93.9987 94.9517
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131103066UNSAT 102.674 102.768
galac E1103073UNSAT 104.756 105.764
Sugar v1.13+picosat1103067UNSAT 174.39 174.989
galac M1103072UNSAT 179.973 181.74
Sugar v1.13+minisat1103068UNSAT 208.743 210.845
casper zao1103076UNSAT 712.549 718.769
casper zito1103077UNSAT 728.915 732.359
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301103061? (TO) 1800.08 1800.92
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301103060? (TO) 1800.08 1802.02
bpsolver 2008-06-271103069? (TO) 1800.1 1804.41

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: