CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-3_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-3_ext.xml
MD5SUM3b0f4f3d9fb4873abcdbd753efb5e9cf
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.870866
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints103
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size80
Number of constraints which are defined in extension103
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271103043UNSAT 0.870866 0.880903
Mistral-prime 1.3131103053UNSAT 0.910861 0.923023
cpHydra k_401103059UNSAT 0.91286 0.924484
cpHydra k_101103058UNSAT 0.942855 0.949836
Mistral-option 1.3141103052UNSAT 1.06684 1.07175
MDG-probe 2008-06-271103042UNSAT 1.08283 1.09622
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301103040UNSAT 2.56961 2.62758
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261103049UNSAT 8.21875 8.3422
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261103048UNSAT 8.5617 8.66359
spider 2008-06-141103041UNSAT 9.38457 9.47885
Abscon 112v4 AC1103056UNSAT 13.132 13.2241
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131103044UNSAT 13.7109 13.8631
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1103057UNSAT 13.7129 13.8569
Sugar v1.13+minisat1103046UNSAT 18.2532 18.5079
Sugar v1.13+picosat1103045UNSAT 20.4549 20.7427
galac E1103051UNSAT 20.6169 20.7778
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107234UNSAT 21.1868 21.4671
galac M1103050UNSAT 25.8291 26.0944
bpsolver 2008-06-271103047UNSAT 45.2461 45.6452
casper zito1103055UNSAT 82.5365 82.5614
casper zao1103054UNSAT 151.976 152.732
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301103038? (TO) 1800.04 1816.52
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301103039? (TO) 1800.13 1808.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: