CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-94_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.8/
normalized-rand-2-40-80-103-800-94_ext.xml
MD5SUMff582e16aee3eb55b2d45d7d6abdcec0
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark8.81066
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints103
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size80
Number of constraints which are defined in extension103
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271102954UNSAT 8.81066 8.88419
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271102955UNSAT 10.0895 10.1694
Mistral-prime 1.3131102965UNSAT 10.7354 10.8305
Mistral-option 1.3141102964UNSAT 10.8493 10.9395
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301102952UNSAT 20.3409 20.5409
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261102961UNSAT 72.66 72.7099
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261102960UNSAT 79.213 79.9228
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1102969UNSAT 93.3808 94.285
Abscon 112v4 AC1102968UNSAT 93.7018 94.6363
cpHydra k_101102970UNSAT 93.9977 97.0719
cpHydra k_401102971UNSAT 94.2927 94.5897
galac E1102963UNSAT 477.199 479.55
spider 2008-06-141102953UNSAT 611.056 615.805
galac M1102962UNSAT 971.779 973.717
Sugar v1.13+minisat1102958UNSAT 980.026 983.121
Sugar v1.13+picosat1102957UNSAT 1083.25 1094.91
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107250UNSAT 1094.44 1101.68
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131102956UNSAT 1281.88 1285.64
casper zito1102967UNSAT 1482.3 1491.77
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301102951? (TO) 1800.05 1810.22
casper zao1102966? (TO) 1800.06 1800.81
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301102950? (TO) 1800.06 1801.52
bpsolver 2008-06-271102959? (TO) 1800.08 1807.61

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: