CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-78_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-78_ext.xml
MD5SUM8c1f6ccac803ecd715fe8379bb39abf1
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark3.51946
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints752
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension752
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271102470UNSAT 3.51946 3.55402
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271102471UNSAT 3.55646 3.60535
Mistral-option 1.3141102480UNSAT 3.74443 3.77189
Mistral-prime 1.3131102481UNSAT 3.84841 3.88207
bpsolver 2008-06-271102475UNSAT 4.52731 4.71293
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261102477UNSAT 10.6354 10.9252
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261102476UNSAT 10.9373 11.057
cpHydra k_101102486UNSAT 11.1873 11.4012
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1102485UNSAT 11.1933 11.301
cpHydra k_401102487UNSAT 11.9002 12.26
Abscon 112v4 AC1102484UNSAT 12.2031 12.3422
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301102468UNSAT 17.5003 17.6614
Sugar v1.13+minisat1102474UNSAT 19.1241 19.3213
spider 2008-06-141102469UNSAT 30.5074 30.7539
galac E1102479UNSAT 45.903 46.7927
galac M1102478UNSAT 55.6815 56.2374
Sugar v1.13+picosat1102473UNSAT 76.2314 76.9384
casper zito1102483UNSAT 77.3023 77.8989
casper zao1102482UNSAT 108.685 109.116
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107162UNSAT 113.643 113.738
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131102472UNSAT 261.12 263.655
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301102466? (TO) 1800 1809.02
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301102467? (TO) 1800.05 1814.42

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: