CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-50-23-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-50-23-587-230-fcd-17_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-50-23-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-50-23-587-230-fcd-17_ext.xml
MD5SUM13f906e945eab847e55ab8ff9e44e155
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark200.667
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints461
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size23
Number of constraints which are defined in extension461
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
cpHydra k_101102068SAT 200.667 200.927
cpHydra k_401102069SAT 200.816 201.162
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1102067SAT 200.906 202.666
Abscon 112v4 AC1102066SAT 210.961 212.787
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301102050SAT 276.869 279.282
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301102048SAT 340.734 340.936
Mistral-option 1.3141102062SAT 390.599 393.328
spider 2008-06-141102051SAT 1544.05 1547.91
Mistral-prime 1.3131102063SAT 1658.14 1662.48
MDG-probe 2008-06-271102052SAT 1766.04 1778.03
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271102053SAT 1784.06 1794.78
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301102049? (TO) 1800.02 1801.32
galac M1102060? (TO) 1800.05 1811.72
casper zito1102065? (TO) 1800.07 1809.51
bpsolver 2008-06-271102057? (TO) 1800.08 1811.82
Sugar v1.13+picosat1102055? (TO) 1800.09 1808.02
galac E1102061? (TO) 1800.09 1807.61
casper zao1102064? (TO) 1800.09 1806.11
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106751? (TO) 1800.11 1806.51
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261102058? (TO) 1800.12 1806.64
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131102054? (TO) 1800.13 1811.09
Sugar v1.13+minisat1102056? (TO) 1800.13 1816.62
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261102059? (TO) 1800.18 1810.78

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
21 17 8 13 1 16 1 20 13 5 4 5 15 10 20 18 9 16 15 16 2 8 1 10 21 5 7 18 0 16 4 8 6 3 5 13 21 6 1 21 2 7 15 11 4 18 13 20 22 2