CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-40-19-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-40-19-443-230-fcd-23_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-40-19-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-40-19-443-230-fcd-23_ext.xml
MD5SUM9134282df2ceb7b4f7b3cea4f5381931
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2.76258
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints333
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size19
Number of constraints which are defined in extension333
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131101535SAT 2.76258 2.79477
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271101525SAT 3.39148 3.41392
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106706SAT 6.00409 6.10508
MDG-probe 2008-06-271101524SAT 6.98794 7.05714
Mistral-option 1.3141101534SAT 7.29489 7.36423
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1101539SAT 8.96164 9.07057
Abscon 112v4 AC1101538SAT 9.29359 9.41933
cpHydra k_101101540SAT 10.2124 10.3767
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301101522SAT 15.7426 15.9121
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301101520SAT 16.3305 16.4174
cpHydra k_401101541SAT 16.6125 16.8992
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261101531SAT 23.1085 23.3273
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261101530SAT 23.2235 23.4381
bpsolver 2008-06-271101529SAT 40.9968 41.1717
Sugar v1.13+picosat1101527SAT 72.183 72.9273
spider 2008-06-141101523SAT 102.582 103.461
Sugar v1.13+minisat1101528SAT 347.277 347.697
casper zao1101536SAT 502.617 506.95
casper zito1101537SAT 1445.16 1447.08
galac M1101532? (TO) 1800.06 1804.12
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301101521? (TO) 1800.07 1800.82
galac E1101533? (TO) 1800.09 1809.71
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131101526? (TO) 1800.11 1807.56

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
17 15 8 7 6 5 9 2 9 11 2 16 0 5 7 1 7 4 16 12 0 0 15 1 1 2 13 10 7 1 11 16 4 2 2 0 12 2 3 5