CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-29_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-29_ext.xml
MD5SUM2ff1d0b0e6bdd5eb572e276d708361aa
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2.00069
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints84
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size180
Number of constraints which are defined in extension84
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131100743UNSAT 2.00069 2.01329
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271100733UNSAT 2.35264 2.38074
MDG-probe 2008-06-271100732UNSAT 3.00154 3.03363
Mistral-option 1.3141100742UNSAT 4.84026 4.94366
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301100730UNSAT 5.30919 5.41313
spider 2008-06-141100731UNSAT 30.2794 30.5217
Abscon 112v4 AC1100746UNSAT 32.0471 32.3579
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1100747UNSAT 32.5471 33.2313
cpHydra k_101100748UNSAT 39.666 39.8944
cpHydra k_401100749UNSAT 39.8409 40.1282
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131100734UNSAT 47.2408 47.7545
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261100739UNSAT 54.9956 55.2652
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261100738UNSAT 60.1888 60.7603
galac M1100740UNSAT 63.4714 64.1167
galac E1100741UNSAT 65.949 66.6152
Sugar v1.13+picosat1100735UNSAT 72.9739 73.7413
Sugar v1.13+minisat1100736UNSAT 86.0159 86.9811
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107257UNSAT 162.191 163.837
casper zito1100745UNSAT 727.301 727.6
casper zao1100744UNSAT 740.909 750.125
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301100728? (TO) 1800.04 1811.22
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301100729? (TO) 1800.05 1811.12
bpsolver 2008-06-271100737? (TO) 1800.08 1809.91

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: