CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.65/
normalized-rand-2-40-40-135-650-37_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.65/
normalized-rand-2-40-40-135-650-37_ext.xml
MD5SUMab3553351ec8972fad25e17e705701ed
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark8.01778
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints135
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size40
Number of constraints which are defined in extension135
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141100060UNSAT 8.01778 8.09085
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271100051UNSAT 8.09777 8.16645
MDG-probe 2008-06-271100050UNSAT 8.12776 8.1973
Mistral-prime 1.3131100061UNSAT 8.19875 8.24187
cpHydra k_401100067UNSAT 15.7416 16.0857
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301100048UNSAT 17.7423 17.7937
Abscon 112v4 AC1100064UNSAT 33.7789 34.1291
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1100065UNSAT 34.5247 34.9009
cpHydra k_101100066UNSAT 39.25 39.4499
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261100056UNSAT 49.6664 50.1868
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261100057UNSAT 54.5247 55.091
spider 2008-06-141100049UNSAT 124.017 125.095
bpsolver 2008-06-271100055UNSAT 161.833 163.09
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107216UNSAT 232.065 234.319
Sugar v1.13+minisat1100054UNSAT 524.605 528.914
galac E1100059UNSAT 639.895 640.67
casper zao1100062UNSAT 703.948 710.411
Sugar v1.13+picosat1100053UNSAT 744.873 750.715
galac M1100058UNSAT 845.957 850.908
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131100052UNSAT 1373.27 1373.8
casper zito1100063? (TO) 1800.02 1802.71
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301100046? (TO) 1800.02 1817.52
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301100047? (TO) 1800.07 1808.62

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: