CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-7_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-7_ext.xml
MD5SUM66b3ebba2a363d71d54b19da1f0fad2a
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.25696
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints224
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension224
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099698SAT 0.25696 0.263402
Mistral-option 1.3141099708SAT 0.299954 0.304267
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099699SAT 0.340947 0.346377
cpHydra k_101099714SAT 0.354945 0.361989
Mistral-prime 1.3131099709SAT 0.362944 0.374994
cpHydra k_401099715SAT 0.38494 0.406845
bpsolver 2008-06-271099703SAT 0.463928 0.464435
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099694SAT 0.589909 0.656495
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099704SAT 0.934857 0.945891
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099705SAT 0.97985 0.995929
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099696SAT 1.16682 1.20851
Abscon 112v4 AC1099712SAT 1.3218 1.3627
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099713SAT 1.3418 1.35429
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099701SAT 1.46678 1.57152
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099702SAT 1.66375 1.75327
casper zito1099711SAT 3.41648 3.42174
spider 2008-06-141099697SAT 4.02439 4.0676
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106677SAT 4.40933 4.47624
galac E1099707SAT 4.70229 4.79857
casper zao1099710SAT 9.14261 9.2376
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099700SAT 10.2214 10.2118
galac M1099706SAT 15.5886 15.7397
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099695SAT 878.244 882.204

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
1 5 10 8 14 8 2 1 6 12 2 7 2 10 10 3 0 1 7 9 0 13 7 7 7 13 5 12 6 4