CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-49_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-49_ext.xml
MD5SUM46ae69d368e9ad75a14880c928a2f6d9
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.158975
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints223
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension223
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131099489SAT 0.158975 0.159333
cpHydra k_101099494SAT 0.173972 0.175779
cpHydra k_401099495SAT 0.180971 0.187233
Mistral-option 1.3141099488SAT 0.242962 0.254117
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099479SAT 0.303953 0.310205
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099478SAT 0.349946 0.36128
casper zito1099491SAT 0.412937 0.419833
bpsolver 2008-06-271099483SAT 0.552915 0.560808
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099474SAT 0.643901 0.695139
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099476SAT 0.965852 0.996243
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099485SAT 1.14782 1.19631
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099484SAT 1.23781 1.30942
Abscon 112v4 AC1099492SAT 1.70574 1.72446
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099493SAT 1.84172 1.87563
spider 2008-06-141099477SAT 2.04169 2.05263
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099480SAT 2.42063 2.47006
galac M1099486SAT 2.6326 2.73772
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099481SAT 2.96555 3.08608
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099482SAT 3.58445 3.7621
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106674SAT 5.21321 5.28314
galac E1099487SAT 5.8981 6.0236
casper zao1099490SAT 9.74552 9.84721
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099475? (TO) 1800.04 1806.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
9 3 10 13 6 2 3 2 4 7 2 3 3 7 13 1 4 12 6 0 6 5 5 1 8 4 8 8 4 5