CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-50_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-50_ext.xml
MD5SUMd7f0f685d607bb4ad06010ffd3b556f5
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.077988
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints225
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension225
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141099466SAT 0.077988 0.0835161
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099457SAT 0.082986 0.089436
Mistral-prime 1.3131099467SAT 0.102984 0.108177
cpHydra k_401099473SAT 0.113982 0.125717
cpHydra k_101099472SAT 0.116981 0.124271
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099456SAT 0.306953 0.312725
bpsolver 2008-06-271099461SAT 0.631903 0.639957
casper zito1099469SAT 0.765882 0.778579
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099463SAT 0.851869 0.885198
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099462SAT 0.951854 1.00923
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099454SAT 0.952855 0.999562
spider 2008-06-141099455SAT 1.17982 1.19815
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099471SAT 1.24181 1.25169
Abscon 112v4 AC1099470SAT 1.27481 1.31602
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099459SAT 1.64175 1.71285
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106676SAT 1.9457 1.98231
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099460SAT 2.12568 2.26685
galac M1099464SAT 2.6396 2.72624
galac E1099465SAT 2.66159 2.75403
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099452SAT 2.88256 2.924
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099458SAT 4.5873 4.68611
casper zao1099468SAT 11.2313 11.3404
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099453? (TO) 1800.06 1801.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
5 3 8 7 1 1 1 3 6 8 5 2 0 4 8 12 2 13 5 7 5 3 1 1 2 14 13 5 6 11