CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-38_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-38_ext.xml
MD5SUMee1bcf9dc93267b42de0a7d48dfbab6b
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.738886
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints223
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension223
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099386SAT 0.738886 0.789784
Abscon 112v4 AC1099404SAT 0.884865 0.944557
Mistral-option 1.3141099400SAT 0.977851 0.977997
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099390SAT 0.97885 0.990279
Mistral-prime 1.3131099401SAT 0.991848 1.00374
cpHydra k_101099406SAT 1.02084 1.03326
cpHydra k_401099407SAT 1.02084 1.03136
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099391SAT 1.07583 1.08751
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099405SAT 1.49677 1.51337
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099393SAT 1.71174 1.85545
bpsolver 2008-06-271099395SAT 1.76273 1.76441
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099388SAT 2.94055 3.02944
galac M1099398SAT 3.42048 3.54695
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099394SAT 5.04823 5.20719
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099397SAT 5.16521 5.21031
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099396SAT 5.67914 5.73325
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106670SAT 6.16606 6.24895
galac E1099399SAT 6.95394 7.07487
spider 2008-06-141099389SAT 9.02363 9.11354
casper zao1099402SAT 12.5691 12.6216
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099392SAT 14.5988 14.7923
casper zito1099403SAT 14.7868 14.9172
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099387? (TO) 1800.07 1816.52

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
3 13 10 12 14 4 1 3 5 2 13 5 5 5 8 11 10 6 13 8 12 13 2 3 6 7 6 3 4 4