CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-19_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-19_ext.xml
MD5SUM893ec0d8b9b6ef3270f5a29b61e39a4e
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.689894
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints223
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension223
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099148UNSAT 0.689894 0.698118
Mistral-option 1.3141099158UNSAT 0.756884 0.767634
cpHydra k_401099165UNSAT 0.829873 0.838147
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099149UNSAT 0.860868 0.871853
Mistral-prime 1.3131099159UNSAT 0.865867 0.87707
cpHydra k_101099164UNSAT 0.902862 0.909368
bpsolver 2008-06-271099153UNSAT 1.3228 1.33773
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099146UNSAT 2.96755 3.02837
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099154UNSAT 3.74043 3.78988
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099155UNSAT 3.74543 3.82147
Abscon 112v4 AC1099162UNSAT 5.20021 5.26373
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099163UNSAT 5.2722 5.36611
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099152UNSAT 6.35203 6.48635
galac E1099157UNSAT 7.13991 7.23381
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099151UNSAT 7.17991 7.36592
spider 2008-06-141099147UNSAT 9.50055 9.57559
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106681UNSAT 14.1259 14.293
galac M1099156UNSAT 16.3525 16.5745
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099150UNSAT 21.9707 22.0225
casper zito1099161UNSAT 72.6929 73.3005
casper zao1099160UNSAT 88.9245 89.2952
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099144? (TO) 1800.04 1800.92
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099145? (TO) 1800.07 1807.32

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: