CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-6_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-6_ext.xml
MD5SUMd75f282008622a5248c9f974d30ca5e0
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.426934
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints223
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension223
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099127UNSAT 0.426934 0.433209
Mistral-prime 1.3131099137UNSAT 0.440932 0.452686
Mistral-option 1.3141099136UNSAT 0.449931 0.456023
cpHydra k_101099142UNSAT 0.465929 0.478583
cpHydra k_401099143UNSAT 0.470927 0.478715
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099126UNSAT 0.564913 0.569781
bpsolver 2008-06-271099131UNSAT 0.886864 0.897576
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099124UNSAT 2.03869 2.09967
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099132UNSAT 2.33864 2.39192
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099133UNSAT 2.6296 2.66568
galac E1099135UNSAT 3.42648 3.47992
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099130UNSAT 3.47347 3.57585
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099141UNSAT 3.58945 3.64584
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099129UNSAT 3.60445 3.68357
Abscon 112v4 AC1099140UNSAT 3.63545 3.71053
galac M1099134UNSAT 5.79012 5.90081
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106696UNSAT 6.13907 6.22084
spider 2008-06-141099125UNSAT 6.36003 6.41834
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099128UNSAT 8.50771 8.63691
casper zito1099139UNSAT 13.458 13.5879
casper zao1099138UNSAT 85.38 85.7289
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099122? (TO) 1800.02 1804.62
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099123? (TO) 1800.03 1811.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: