CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-48_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-48_ext.xml
MD5SUM67f20e5c86182832e0ca2985c63c5e30
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.068989
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints223
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension223
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141098894SAT 0.068989 0.0740811
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271098885SAT 0.140978 0.150916
Mistral-prime 1.3131098895SAT 0.197968 0.200905
cpHydra k_401098901SAT 0.224965 0.232717
cpHydra k_101098900SAT 0.227964 0.235017
MDG-probe 2008-06-271098884SAT 0.234963 0.248011
spider 2008-06-141098883SAT 0.362944 0.371783
bpsolver 2008-06-271098889SAT 0.928858 0.937911
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301098882SAT 1.26681 1.32308
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261098891SAT 2.02669 2.09379
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261098890SAT 2.18867 2.26565
Sugar v1.13+picosat1098887SAT 2.49462 2.59723
Sugar v1.13+minisat1098888SAT 2.51062 2.61645
Abscon 112v4 AC1098898SAT 2.70659 2.77211
galac E1098893SAT 2.78757 2.97266
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1098899SAT 2.95655 2.98736
casper zito1098897SAT 3.01854 3.04685
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301098880SAT 5.39618 5.47724
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106693SAT 6.554 6.66835
casper zao1098896SAT 6.81196 6.82657
galac M1098892SAT 7.61784 7.78521
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131098886SAT 7.83781 7.86243
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301098881? (TO) 1800.08 1801.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
9 11 2 6 14 3 11 8 1 7 10 10 5 1 4 4 7 4 7 7 6 11 13 5 13 11 1 12 5 3