CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-5_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-5_ext.xml
MD5SUMec15930c749c78e639f3a37e785f6887
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.063989
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints220
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension220
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141098850SAT 0.063989 0.144839
MDG-probe 2008-06-271098840SAT 0.248961 0.259647
Mistral-prime 1.3131098851SAT 0.315951 0.467955
casper zito1098853SAT 0.317951 0.345429
cpHydra k_401098857SAT 0.355945 0.361703
cpHydra k_101098856SAT 0.356945 0.368092
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271098841SAT 0.45293 0.458503
bpsolver 2008-06-271098845SAT 0.691893 0.699086
spider 2008-06-141098839SAT 0.882865 0.895318
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301098838SAT 1.14982 1.20582
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301098836SAT 1.3198 1.37377
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106695SAT 2.25466 2.32792
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261098846SAT 2.31665 2.35554
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261098847SAT 2.47262 2.50536
Sugar v1.13+minisat1098844SAT 2.76058 2.8716
galac E1098849SAT 3.36749 3.50166
Abscon 112v4 AC1098854SAT 3.76543 4.40399
casper zao1098852SAT 3.83642 3.86501
Sugar v1.13+picosat1098843SAT 4.06138 4.19771
galac M1098848SAT 4.19236 4.28788
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1098855SAT 4.27735 4.33549
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131098842SAT 10.4114 10.4618
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301098837SAT 1016.61 1026.37

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
7 5 12 10 4 3 2 5 8 0 9 1 9 2 6 1 0 4 4 14 7 10 0 2 0 4 8 12 13 4