CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/composed-75-1-25/
normalized-composed-75-1-25-9_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/composed-75-1-25/
normalized-composed-75-1-25-9_ext.xml
MD5SUM2c3186fac4bf5bb57c561f6978d99ef0
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.048992
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables83
Number of constraints647
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension647
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131098213UNSAT 0.048992 0.0564501
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271098203UNSAT 0.050991 0.057512
Mistral-option 1.3141098212UNSAT 0.054991 0.0556911
cpHydra k_401098219UNSAT 0.05999 0.0627171
cpHydra k_101098218UNSAT 0.064989 0.070788
casper zito1098215UNSAT 0.081987 0.0858629
spider 2008-06-141098201UNSAT 0.091985 0.094389
MDG-probe 2008-06-271098202UNSAT 0.175972 0.1835
casper zao1098214UNSAT 0.197969 0.199399
bpsolver 2008-06-271098207UNSAT 0.401938 0.414043
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301098200UNSAT 0.742886 0.802997
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261098209UNSAT 0.752884 0.779135
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105424UNSAT 0.824873 0.845455
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261098208UNSAT 0.997848 1.04669
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1098217UNSAT 1.00285 1.10207
Abscon 112v4 AC1098216UNSAT 1.07883 1.11069
Sugar v1.13+minisat1098206UNSAT 1.17382 1.23514
Sugar v1.13+picosat1098205UNSAT 1.34679 1.41482
galac M1098210UNSAT 1.40879 1.5065
galac E1098211UNSAT 1.41279 1.46515
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131098204UNSAT 2.32765 2.34602
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301098198? (TO) 1800.08 1819.62
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301098199? (TO) 1800.09 1807.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: