CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-27_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-27_ext.xml
MD5SUMeb871acdd36f38c6ca314a2281d59de9
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark9.55755
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141097816UNSAT 9.55755 9.65315
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097806UNSAT 9.8745 9.96277
Mistral-prime 1.3131097817UNSAT 10.2254 10.3144
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097807UNSAT 10.3914 10.447
bpsolver 2008-06-271097811UNSAT 16.2105 16.2159
cpHydra k_101097822UNSAT 17.2014 17.3801
cpHydra k_401097823UNSAT 18.8781 19.2433
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097804UNSAT 32.2351 32.5914
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097812UNSAT 41.8416 42.228
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097813UNSAT 42.4665 42.8947
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097821UNSAT 44.6802 44.9286
Abscon 112v4 AC1097820UNSAT 49.7334 50.2421
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097810UNSAT 107.513 108.631
spider 2008-06-141097805UNSAT 131.073 132.274
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107184UNSAT 170.603 172.245
casper zito1097819UNSAT 200.025 200.99
galac E1097815UNSAT 221.736 223.906
casper zao1097818UNSAT 261.555 262.835
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097809UNSAT 352.225 353.028
galac M1097814UNSAT 496.352 499.114
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097802? (TO) 1800.02 1808.52
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097803? (TO) 1800.08 1810.22
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097808? (TO) 1800.15 1803.28

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: