CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-40_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-40_ext.xml
MD5SUM608e629c79e33bd31b2fe99ff5c8dad4
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark7.28489
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141097706UNSAT 7.28489 7.28752
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097697UNSAT 9.37457 9.44948
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097696UNSAT 9.79151 9.8878
Mistral-prime 1.3131097707UNSAT 10.0025 10.0984
bpsolver 2008-06-271097701UNSAT 15.4477 15.5875
cpHydra k_101097712UNSAT 16.2785 16.4122
cpHydra k_401097713UNSAT 17.9493 18.2846
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097694UNSAT 24.1593 24.2295
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097711UNSAT 29.5995 29.8975
Abscon 112v4 AC1097710UNSAT 32.884 33.0948
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097702UNSAT 35.6406 35.6922
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097703UNSAT 35.9625 36.2943
spider 2008-06-141097695UNSAT 126.999 127.993
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097700UNSAT 136.817 138.047
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107187UNSAT 155.985 157.508
casper zito1097709UNSAT 184.649 186.26
galac E1097705UNSAT 205.608 207.578
casper zao1097708UNSAT 240.54 241.509
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097699UNSAT 330.196 333.406
galac M1097704UNSAT 581.185 583.59
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097698UNSAT 1293.86 1301.1
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097692? (TO) 1800.05 1801.22
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097693? (TO) 1800.07 1803.52

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: