CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-55_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-55_ext.xml
MD5SUMf7d9c912dc1712bbdfc15a8a9472daa6
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark6.08008
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141097684UNSAT 6.08008 6.08367
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097674UNSAT 6.08207 6.10449
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097675UNSAT 6.33604 6.39391
Mistral-prime 1.3131097685UNSAT 6.74197 6.78216
bpsolver 2008-06-271097679UNSAT 9.09162 9.13154
cpHydra k_101097690UNSAT 13.327 13.5387
cpHydra k_401097691UNSAT 14.6068 14.8892
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097672UNSAT 19.726 19.9511
Abscon 112v4 AC1097688UNSAT 21.0618 21.1773
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097689UNSAT 22.3896 22.6478
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097680UNSAT 24.8732 24.9227
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097681UNSAT 25.5211 25.777
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097678UNSAT 72.0011 72.7508
galac E1097683UNSAT 83.3323 84.1821
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107189UNSAT 103.546 104.421
spider 2008-06-141097673UNSAT 121.013 122.057
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097677UNSAT 156.595 157.511
casper zao1097686UNSAT 210.022 211.842
galac M1097682UNSAT 252.883 254.119
casper zito1097687UNSAT 334.239 337.283
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097676UNSAT 838.688 846.017
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097670? (TO) 1800 1816.72
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097671? (TO) 1800.08 1801.73

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: