CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-16_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-16_ext.xml
MD5SUM353fe73398f62a5e481812f92f5cede2
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.86211
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints180
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size25
Number of constraints which are defined in extension180
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131097377UNSAT 5.86211 5.91571
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097367UNSAT 5.8971 5.95037
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097366UNSAT 5.97109 6.02834
Mistral-option 1.3141097376UNSAT 6.05108 6.10447
Abscon 112v4 AC1097380UNSAT 13.09 13.2046
cpHydra k_401097383UNSAT 13.417 13.7048
cpHydra k_101097382UNSAT 13.477 13.664
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097381UNSAT 13.9199 14.006
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097364UNSAT 15.3727 15.4741
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097372UNSAT 29.2676 29.2926
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097373UNSAT 29.7785 30.0916
spider 2008-06-141097365UNSAT 81.4686 81.8799
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097370UNSAT 112.943 114.152
bpsolver 2008-06-271097371UNSAT 120.075 120.985
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107198UNSAT 164.188 165.051
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097369UNSAT 197.742 199.703
galac E1097375UNSAT 349.297 352.647
galac M1097374UNSAT 375.948 378.627
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097368UNSAT 746.399 746.711
casper zao1097378UNSAT 991.295 995.295
casper zito1097379UNSAT 1135.57 1146.02
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097362? (TO) 1800.02 1814.12
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097363? (TO) 1800.08 1815.52

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: