CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-24_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-24_ext.xml
MD5SUMfc9ad1f135834eb048e4bc1b71381aef
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark22.3986
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints180
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size25
Number of constraints which are defined in extension180
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141097354UNSAT 22.3986 22.6
Mistral-prime 1.3131097355UNSAT 22.6786 22.7975
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097345UNSAT 22.6975 22.9169
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097344UNSAT 26.6769 26.9162
cpHydra k_101097360UNSAT 30.1414 30.5058
cpHydra k_401097361UNSAT 30.8013 31.2503
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097359UNSAT 68.1506 68.8464
Abscon 112v4 AC1097358UNSAT 68.5226 69.23
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097342UNSAT 74.7236 75.4084
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097351UNSAT 98.98 99.9779
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097350UNSAT 107.64 108.597
bpsolver 2008-06-271097349UNSAT 208.771 209.683
spider 2008-06-141097343UNSAT 509.071 513.922
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107201UNSAT 666.443 669.181
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097348UNSAT 926.28 935.244
casper zito1097357UNSAT 1696.83 1711.78
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097340? (TO) 1800 1801.22
galac M1097352? (TO) 1800.01 1814.71
galac E1097353? (TO) 1800.02 1817.22
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097341? (TO) 1800.07 1808.33
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097347? (TO) 1800.1 1812.62
casper zao1097356? (TO) 1800.1 1806.91
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097346? (TO) 1800.16 1800.88

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: