CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/composed-75-1-2/
normalized-composed-75-1-2-0_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/composed-75-1-2/
normalized-composed-75-1-2-0_ext.xml
MD5SUM005cb52156c07d79f762aa943b5f890f
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.046992
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables83
Number of constraints624
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension624
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131096981UNSAT 0.046992 0.0534161
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271096971UNSAT 0.049992 0.0563729
Mistral-option 1.3141096980UNSAT 0.051991 0.060461
cpHydra k_101096986UNSAT 0.05899 0.0654711
cpHydra k_401096987UNSAT 0.06099 0.0679771
casper zito1096983UNSAT 0.074987 0.083331
spider 2008-06-141096969UNSAT 0.097984 0.106582
MDG-probe 2008-06-271096970UNSAT 0.106983 0.112507
casper zao1096982UNSAT 0.198968 0.206226
bpsolver 2008-06-271096975UNSAT 0.398939 0.404049
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105425UNSAT 0.599907 0.604663
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301096968UNSAT 0.704891 0.753197
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261096977UNSAT 0.801877 0.840639
Abscon 112v4 AC1096984UNSAT 0.941856 0.99404
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261096976UNSAT 0.996848 1.05149
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1096985UNSAT 1.12683 1.15247
Sugar v1.13+minisat1096974UNSAT 1.18182 1.28632
Sugar v1.13+picosat1096973UNSAT 1.47178 1.57189
galac M1096978UNSAT 1.57476 1.62492
galac E1096979UNSAT 1.67974 1.72879
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131096972UNSAT 2.45663 2.48616
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301096966? (TO) 1800.05 1804.62
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301096967? (TO) 1800.09 1810.52

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: