CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.2/
normalized-rand-2-40-11-414-200-76_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.2/
normalized-rand-2-40-11-414-200-76_ext.xml
MD5SUMb73739947302319b802c796b3d6b0a99
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark7.45187
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints414
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size11
Number of constraints which are defined in extension414
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271096794UNSAT 7.45187 7.48595
Mistral-prime 1.3131096805UNSAT 7.59385 7.59687
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271096795UNSAT 8.18875 8.22394
Mistral-option 1.3141096804UNSAT 8.36673 8.44565
bpsolver 2008-06-271096799UNSAT 8.45571 8.49348
cpHydra k_401096811UNSAT 15.6176 15.9538
cpHydra k_101096810UNSAT 16.0646 16.3117
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261096800UNSAT 26.9429 27.0041
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1096809UNSAT 29.3455 29.6141
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261096801UNSAT 29.3505 29.6759
Abscon 112v4 AC1096808UNSAT 31.2812 31.5993
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301096792UNSAT 35.1257 35.5185
Sugar v1.13+minisat1096798UNSAT 64.7312 64.884
spider 2008-06-141096793UNSAT 98.1861 98.9518
casper zito1096807UNSAT 119.067 119.982
galac E1096803UNSAT 131.321 132.583
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107178UNSAT 161.757 163.331
galac M1096802UNSAT 172.36 172.525
Sugar v1.13+picosat1096797UNSAT 194.528 196.47
casper zao1096806UNSAT 212.981 213.977
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131096796UNSAT 998.02 1001.69
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301096790? (TO) 1800.01 1805.72
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301096791? (TO) 1800.02 1805.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: