CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/ehi-90/
normalized-ehi-90-315-95_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/ehi-90/
normalized-ehi-90-315-95_ext.xml
MD5SUM01818ffd329898308a1df86965bf9bde
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.113982
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables315
Number of constraints4372
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size7
Number of constraints which are defined in extension4372
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141096408UNSAT 0.113982 0.114522
Mistral-prime 1.3131096409UNSAT 0.12498 0.132251
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271096399UNSAT 0.12898 0.136899
cpHydra k_401096415UNSAT 0.129979 0.129791
cpHydra k_101096414UNSAT 0.133979 0.292453
casper zito1096411UNSAT 0.555914 0.557919
casper zao1096410UNSAT 0.609906 0.617832
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261096405UNSAT 0.878865 0.888635
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261096404UNSAT 0.952854 0.994838
MDG-probe 2008-06-271096398UNSAT 1.01684 1.03397
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1096413UNSAT 1.36979 1.42179
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105489UNSAT 1.51077 1.5455
Abscon 112v4 AC1096412UNSAT 1.99569 2.07422
spider 2008-06-141096397UNSAT 2.04969 2.05472
Sugar v1.13+minisat1096402UNSAT 2.15867 2.28184
Sugar v1.13+picosat1096401UNSAT 2.52461 2.64929
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301096396UNSAT 3.11752 3.17905
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131096400UNSAT 3.85341 3.8247
galac E1096407UNSAT 4.54731 4.60119
galac M1096406UNSAT 4.6133 4.73599
bpsolver 2008-06-271096403UNSAT 34.1048 34.4363
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301096395? (TO) 1800.02 1808.12
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301096394? (TO) 1800.06 1810.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: