CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/subs/
normalized-scen07-sub1.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/subs/
normalized-scen07-sub1.xml
MD5SUM3f671457976ec6c63daee406271fbebb
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.074987
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables28
Number of constraints314
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size44
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension314
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
casper zito1095904UNSAT 0.05899 0.0663061
Mistral-option 1.3141095901UNSAT 0.074987 0.081684
bpsolver 2008-06-271095896UNSAT 0.076987 0.0827871
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271095892UNSAT 0.085986 0.093452
Mistral-prime 1.3131095902UNSAT 0.088985 0.096074
cpHydra k_101095907UNSAT 0.106982 0.11199
MDG-probe 2008-06-271095891UNSAT 0.109982 0.114907
cpHydra k_401095908UNSAT 0.109983 0.117177
casper zao1095903UNSAT 0.160974 0.167314
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1095906UNSAT 0.972851 0.990086
Abscon 112v4 AC1095905UNSAT 0.98085 0.98963
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261095897UNSAT 0.997847 1.05242
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261095898UNSAT 1.12283 1.19209
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301095890UNSAT 1.35479 1.38594
Sugar v1.13+minisat1095895UNSAT 1.46578 1.58629
Sugar v1.13+picosat1095894UNSAT 1.75673 1.87293
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131095893UNSAT 3.75343 3.79409
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107042UNSAT 4.02639 4.06886
galac M1095899UNSAT 7.68683 7.76944
galac E1095900UNSAT 9.56054 11.1101
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301095888? (TO) 1800.02 1804.62
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301095889? (TO) 1800.04 1801.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: