CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/fapp/fapp19/
normalized-fapp19-0350-3.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/fapp/fapp19/
normalized-fapp19-0350-3.xml
MD5SUM82501c03dff619489a40ca8145ed1e9c
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.86172
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables350
Number of constraints5873
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size802
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension5873
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
bpsolver 2008-06-271094890UNSAT 1.86172 1.87663
Abscon 112v4 AC1094899UNSAT 23.0725 23.3362
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1094900UNSAT 23.1795 23.4399
cpHydra k_101094901UNSAT 87.6787 87.8181
cpHydra k_401094902UNSAT 94.0977 94.8702
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301094884UNSAT 128.579 129.872
Mistral-prime 1.3131094896UNSAT 222.171 223.515
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301094882UNSAT 243.057 243.163
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301094883UNSAT 247.093 249.318
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261094892UNSAT 279.07 281.745
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261094891UNSAT 280.456 283.175
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271094886UNSAT 286.537 286.645
MDG-probe 2008-06-271094885UNSAT 1302.46 1302.82
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131094887? 0.934857 0.972027
galac E1094894? (problem) 0.423935 0.50977
galac M1094893? (problem) 0.604907 0.66492
Sugar v1.13+minisat1094889? (MO) 212.96 215.449
Sugar v1.13+picosat1094888? (MO) 381.058 383.521
Mistral-option 1.3141094895? (TO) 1800.01 1805.21
casper zao1094897? (TO) 1800.04 1813.23
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105545? (TO) 1800.06 1805.91
casper zito1094898? (TO) 1800.07 1807.91

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: