CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/fapp/fapp19/
normalized-fapp19-0350-5.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/fapp/fapp19/
normalized-fapp19-0350-5.xml
MD5SUM0e6d4c6cfe45c7fb1ed8c7d48e56685a
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.72774
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables350
Number of constraints5873
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size802
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension5873
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
bpsolver 2008-06-271094848UNSAT 1.72774 1.73571
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1094858UNSAT 23.1475 23.2747
Abscon 112v4 AC1094857UNSAT 23.2125 23.456
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271094844UNSAT 87.3357 88.0008
cpHydra k_401094860UNSAT 91.1051 91.6621
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261094850UNSAT 94.5096 94.7109
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261094849UNSAT 94.8606 94.965
cpHydra k_101094859UNSAT 96.6843 97.5076
Mistral-prime 1.3131094854UNSAT 134.572 135.285
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301094842UNSAT 150.343 151.313
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301094840UNSAT 241.099 241.225
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301094841UNSAT 244.381 244.944
MDG-probe 2008-06-271094843UNSAT 893.216 900.934
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131094845? 0.970852 1.07841
galac M1094851? (problem) 0.447931 0.526605
galac E1094852? (problem) 0.58391 0.672522
Sugar v1.13+minisat1094847? (MO) 210.35 213.048
Sugar v1.13+picosat1094846? (MO) 385.14 388.932
Mistral-option 1.3141094853? (TO) 1800.01 1809.52
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105546? (TO) 1800.06 1811.62
casper zito1094856? (TO) 1800.1 1805.41
casper zao1094855? (TO) 1800.12 1816.03

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: