CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/fapp/fapp20/
normalized-fapp20-0420-5.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/fapp/fapp20/
normalized-fapp20-0420-5.xml
MD5SUM70ddb348b4d5b5c4a2e5632f29aa23c6
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1.39279
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables420
Number of constraints4737
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size302
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension4737
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
bpsolver 2008-06-271094827UNSAT 1.39279 1.40977
Abscon 112v4 AC1094836UNSAT 22.0376 22.1473
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1094837UNSAT 22.2316 22.4948
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261094829UNSAT 27.5578 27.8193
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261094828UNSAT 28.1897 28.4816
Mistral-prime 1.3131094833UNSAT 30.3324 30.5956
cpHydra k_401094839UNSAT 36.9974 37.3133
cpHydra k_101094838UNSAT 37.4553 37.7223
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271094823UNSAT 39.581 39.8876
Sugar v1.13+minisat1094826UNSAT 70.7802 72.0429
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301094821UNSAT 118.597 119.818
Sugar v1.13+picosat1094825UNSAT 147.679 168.733
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105548UNSAT 189.766 190.597
MDG-probe 2008-06-271094822UNSAT 194.094 195.058
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131094824? 1618.41 1621.96
galac M1094830? (problem) 0.445931 0.522384
galac E1094831? (problem) 0.44893 0.51925
casper zito1094835? (TO) 1800.03 1813.41
Mistral-option 1.3141094832? (TO) 1800.03 1813.21
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301094820? (TO) 1800.04 1809.53
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301094819? (TO) 1800.1 1800.83
casper zao1094834? (TO) 1800.12 1812.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: