CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/os-taillard-10/
normalized-os-taillard-10-95-1.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/os-taillard-10/
normalized-os-taillard-10-95-1.xml
MD5SUMc4bee948f28d4254d98dcb202c49f529
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.25096
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints900
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size558
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension900
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
bpsolver 2008-06-271094104UNSAT 0.25096 0.256958
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261094105UNSAT 1.3298 1.36668
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261094106UNSAT 1.67774 1.75537
cpHydra k_401094116UNSAT 8.76367 9.00957
cpHydra k_101094115UNSAT 8.97463 9.13975
Sugar v1.13+minisat1094103UNSAT 26.457 26.5874
Sugar v1.13+picosat1094102UNSAT 43.6304 44.1588
Mistral-prime 1.3131094110UNSAT 67.5467 68.1397
MDG-probe 2008-06-271094099UNSAT 77.0443 77.3854
Mistral-option 1.3141094109UNSAT 91.835 92.5491
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271094100UNSAT 160.419 161.677
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131094101? 338.225 340.419
galac M1094107? (problem) 49.6694 50.1805
galac E1094108? (problem) 49.9794 50.4949
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301094098? (TO) 1800.01 1817.52
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301094096? (TO) 1800.04 1800.82
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301094097? (TO) 1800.07 1817.32
casper zao1094111? (TO) 1800.08 1807.81
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106145? (TO) 1800.08 1808.71
casper zito1094112? (TO) 1800.1 1812.11
Abscon 112v4 AC1094113? (TO) 1800.12 1808.86
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1094114? (TO) 1800.15 1817.55

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: