CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/langford4/
normalized-langford-4-2.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/langford4/
normalized-langford-4-2.xml
MD5SUMde5bb072e217b209b719935f87b51d28
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.006998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables8
Number of constraints34
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension34
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271092915UNSAT 0.006998 0.014202
Mistral-prime 1.3131092926UNSAT 0.006998 0.013375
Mistral-option 1.3141092925UNSAT 0.006998 0.00755294
casper zito1092928UNSAT 0.007998 0.0162671
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271092916UNSAT 0.008998 0.013771
casper zao1092927UNSAT 0.010997 0.0136899
cpHydra k_101092931UNSAT 0.017997 0.024624
cpHydra k_401092932UNSAT 0.018996 0.018822
bpsolver 2008-06-271092920UNSAT 0.027995 0.0342399
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105925UNSAT 0.307952 0.328466
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301092912UNSAT 0.471927 0.519567
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301092914UNSAT 0.476927 0.522796
Sugar v1.13+minisat1092919UNSAT 0.496924 0.571829
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261092921UNSAT 0.513921 0.526502
Sugar v1.13+picosat1092918UNSAT 0.51692 0.595412
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301092913UNSAT 0.526919 0.543038
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261092922UNSAT 0.589909 0.632938
Abscon 112v4 AC1092929UNSAT 0.670897 0.735154
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1092930UNSAT 0.699892 0.739006
galac M1092923UNSAT 0.822874 0.887184
galac E1092924UNSAT 0.930858 0.974217
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131092917UNSAT 1.04384 1.08838

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: