CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/js-taillard-20/
normalized-js-taillard-20-95-7.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/js-taillard-20/
normalized-js-taillard-20-95-7.xml
MD5SUMa7bfced7c76430a4e64d921de0f86ae8
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark3.46847
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables400
Number of constraints4180
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size1551
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension4180
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261092565UNSAT 3.46847 3.53313
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261092564UNSAT 3.57446 3.63748
cpHydra k_101092574UNSAT 46.6609 47.2325
Sugar v1.13+minisat1092562UNSAT 195.777 197.671
Sugar v1.13+picosat1092561UNSAT 238.584 240.955
cpHydra k_401092575UNSAT 699.046 702.988
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131092560? 253.883 254.534
galac E1092567? (problem) 73.2579 73.9858
galac M1092566? (problem) 73.4888 74.2742
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301092556? (TO) 1800.02 1801.22
Mistral-option 1.3141092568? (TO) 1800.03 1800.72
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105878? (TO) 1800.05 1810.01
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271092559? (TO) 1800.06 1807.41
casper zito1092571? (TO) 1800.06 1810.41
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301092557? (TO) 1800.06 1814.42
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301092555? (TO) 1800.07 1810.52
MDG-probe 2008-06-271092558? (TO) 1800.08 1806.11
Abscon 112v4 AC1092572? (TO) 1800.09 1817.88
Mistral-prime 1.3131092569? (TO) 1800.1 1815.81
bpsolver 2008-06-271092563? (TO) 1800.1 1805.21
casper zao1092570? (TO) 1800.1 1807.22
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1092573? (TO) 1800.22 1814.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: