CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/mug/
normalized-mug88-25-3.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/mug/
normalized-mug88-25-3.xml
MD5SUMfa389702550597154884e0e53e867320
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.854869
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables88
Number of constraints146
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size3
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension146
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
galac E1091132UNSAT 0.802877 0.84451
Sugar v1.13+picosat1091126UNSAT 0.854869 0.967162
Sugar v1.13+minisat1091127UNSAT 0.856869 0.950343
galac M1091131UNSAT 0.937856 1.00979
Abscon 112v4 AC1091137UNSAT 1.14882 1.20534
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1091138UNSAT 1.2828 1.30256
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131091125UNSAT 1.48077 1.49807
casper zao1091135UNSAT 7.9058 7.97956
cpHydra k_101091139UNSAT 9.62954 9.80252
cpHydra k_401091140UNSAT 10.2004 10.5216
casper zito1091136UNSAT 11.0323 11.1353
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301091121? (TO) 1800 1804.03
Mistral-prime 1.3131091134? (TO) 1800.01 1808.31
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271091124? (TO) 1800.04 1805.01
bpsolver 2008-06-271091128? (TO) 1800.06 1809.91
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261091130? (TO) 1800.07 1805.74
Mistral-option 1.3141091133? (TO) 1800.07 1815.01
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301091120? (TO) 1800.07 1807.42
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301091122? (TO) 1800.09 1801.82
MDG-probe 2008-06-271091123? (TO) 1800.1 1807.91
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105711? (TO) 1800.11 1814.41
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261091129? (TO) 1800.12 1808.54

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: